Difference between revisions of "Analyze morality rationally"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(start page) |
(→Yes! According to some philosophers: add a CodeWOW subsection) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Yes! According to some philosophers== | ==Yes! According to some philosophers== | ||
In various schools of thought, an [[agent]] can use one's [[mind]] in order to [[decide]] on a course of [[action]]. This can be done on the basis of expected [[consequence]]s, experiential [[value]]s, or any other [[motivation]]. | In various schools of thought, an [[agent]] can use one's [[mind]] in order to [[decide]] on a course of [[action]]. This can be done on the basis of expected [[consequence]]s, experiential [[value]]s, or any other [[motivation]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===With CodeWOW=== | ||
| + | This site is in some sense predicated on the rational analysis of morality. | ||
==No! According to some religions== | ==No! According to some religions== | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 23 February 2015
Should you analyze morality rationally?
Yes! According to some philosophers
In various schools of thought, an agent can use one's mind in order to decide on a course of action. This can be done on the basis of expected consequences, experiential values, or any other motivation.
With CodeWOW
This site is in some sense predicated on the rational analysis of morality.
No! According to some religions
Some religions seem to suggest that acting wisely consists of obeying their dictates. In these schemes, thinking about what to do is unwise.
